Some Might Ask...

A Spike

Some might ask, "Have you tried to reach out to any of those interviewed for the podcast?"  I have.  A few months ago, I reached out to someone through social media. I began by asking if I'd contacted the right person.  I was told I had, and this person would answer any questions they could. I then sent a list of questions to them.  I've not received a reply.

What did I ask?  Here is a list of some of the questions:
  
1. Did Greg know Bo before the night of the murders?  If so then how long had they known each other?

2. Did you know Jim Prew, Paul Harter, Chris Campbell, or Robbie Van Heest?

3. Can you think of anything that wasn't included in the podcast that should have been?

Again, these are just some of the questions.  I've not followed up after sending them because it's not in my nature to pester people outside of a classroom.  People have busy lives.  And no, I didn't try to reach out to anyone else.

Given that the interviews in the podcast have been edited to some unknown degree, and given that the court documents only give summary interpretations of the testimonies given during the evidentiary hearing in 2002, it would be good to ask someone interviewed for the podcast what I consider to be outstanding questions.

Have I tried to reach out to Weston Sudduth?  No. I don't see the point in trying to do so.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Fear stalks Berkeley's Rainbow Village"

Image
In this post I will try to walk a thin line between skepticism and cynicism with regard to the  veracity of Vivian Cercy’s testimony .   T o some, cynicism may  appear to be s kepticism , so I will give a definition of skepticism, and then I’ll give a definition of cynicism to distinguish the two clearly.   Skepticism is merely maintaining an attitude of doubt with regard to the truth of a claim or set of claims.   Cynicism, on the other hand, is an inclination to believe that people are purely motivated by self-interest. So there are many reasons to be skeptical regarding the veracity of Vivian Cercy’s testimony, and these go beyond her claim to have seen Mary and Greg with a tall, skinny, blond man around 0130.   These are reasons that prosecuting attorney Jim Anderson (a cynic, in my opinion) could have given a jury to get them to doubt the truth of her entire testimony.   They explain why Vivian Cercy may have told Vincent Johnson   that, “she actually had not seen anything on the
Read more

Brazen Killer or Just a Callous Shithead?

Image
Fennario If you read through the court documents and/or listened to the Dead and Gone podcast, you can't help but think to yourself, "After the murders, did Bo act like a brazen killer or he did merely act like a callous shithead?" Here I'm going to assume (as I have all along) that the following accounts are true.  I'm going to weigh statements attributed to Bo individually, and then weigh them together.   1. " Jong Cheol Cho: Cho was a traveling Deadhead. The referee found Chaffee knew of Cho, whose name and address were disclosed in a police report. Cho testified that he knew someone named Bo, but no one named James Bowen. Cho identified pictures of James Bowen as the man he knew as Bo. Cho was in Rainbow Village the night of the murders. The morning after, he had a conversation with Bo and another man he knew as Weston about the previous night. Bo said either, 'I' or 'we' 'went swimming into [sic] the bay last night.'  In response,
Read more

"But, still, you should be straight up with people. Let 'em know."*

Image
Candor matters. I came across Dead and Gone in February 2021, and I was hooked by the story, because I like listening to Grateful Dead music and the podcast focused on a crime committed in the mid 80's—around the time I was about Greg Kniffin's age, the same age of some interviewed for the podcast.  After I  finished listening to the ten episodes, I went to Reddit to see what others had thought about the podcast and to see if anyone else (e.g. amateur sleuths) had done work on the case.  I came across a thread with the heading, " Lies By Omission By The Duplicitous Payne Lindsey ."  Here I found a link to  People v. Thomas.  I read it and used it to check Lindsey's reporting.  This document led me to look for other court documents that I also used to check Lindsey's reporting.  I also used them to evaluate the postings in the Reddit thread.  While I think some contributors were not fair to Lindsey, nor were they being accurate in their assessment of the report
Read more