Mitchel Weiser and Bonnie Bickwit

Watkins Glen State Park

In an early episode of the first season, the podcast briefly looked at the disappearance of Mitchel Weiser (16 years-old) and Bonnie Bickwit (15 years-old) in 1973.  With the recent coverage of the 50th anniversary of Summer Jam at Watkins Glen, family and friends have hoped to bring more attention to this unsolved mystery.  Rolling Stone just published a story that seems to support this cause.  I was able to read the story for free yesterday, but it seems like they've now put it behind their pay-wall.  Here are some links for those interested. 

Mitchel & Bonnie

Mitch Weiser and Bonnie Bickwit Missing Update:  What Happened to Mitch Weiser and Bonnie Bickwit?

Two Teens Hitchhiked to a Concert.  50 years Later, They Haven't Come Home. (Rolling Stone article).

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Fear stalks Berkeley's Rainbow Village"

Image
In this post I will try to walk a thin line between skepticism and cynicism with regard to the  veracity of Vivian Cercy’s testimony .   T o some, cynicism may  appear to be s kepticism , so I will give a definition of skepticism, and then I’ll give a definition of cynicism to distinguish the two clearly.   Skepticism is merely maintaining an attitude of doubt with regard to the truth of a claim or set of claims.   Cynicism, on the other hand, is an inclination to believe that people are purely motivated by self-interest. So there are many reasons to be skeptical regarding the veracity of Vivian Cercy’s testimony, and these go beyond her claim to have seen Mary and Greg with a tall, skinny, blond man around 0130.   These are reasons that prosecuting attorney Jim Anderson (a cynic, in my opinion) could have given a jury to get them to doubt the truth of her entire testimony.   They explain why Vivian Cercy may have told Vincent Johnson   that, “she actually had not seen anything on the
Read more

Brazen Killer or Just a Callous Shithead?

Image
Fennario If you read through the court documents and/or listened to the Dead and Gone podcast, you can't help but think to yourself, "After the murders, did Bo act like a brazen killer or he did merely act like a callous shithead?" Here I'm going to assume (as I have all along) that the following accounts are true.  I'm going to weigh statements attributed to Bo individually, and then weigh them together.   1. " Jong Cheol Cho: Cho was a traveling Deadhead. The referee found Chaffee knew of Cho, whose name and address were disclosed in a police report. Cho testified that he knew someone named Bo, but no one named James Bowen. Cho identified pictures of James Bowen as the man he knew as Bo. Cho was in Rainbow Village the night of the murders. The morning after, he had a conversation with Bo and another man he knew as Weston about the previous night. Bo said either, 'I' or 'we' 'went swimming into [sic] the bay last night.'  In response,
Read more

"But, still, you should be straight up with people. Let 'em know."*

Image
Candor matters. I came across Dead and Gone in February 2021, and I was hooked by the story, because I like listening to Grateful Dead music and the podcast focused on a crime committed in the mid 80's—around the time I was about Greg Kniffin's age, the same age of some interviewed for the podcast.  After I  finished listening to the ten episodes, I went to Reddit to see what others had thought about the podcast and to see if anyone else (e.g. amateur sleuths) had done work on the case.  I came across a thread with the heading, " Lies By Omission By The Duplicitous Payne Lindsey ."  Here I found a link to  People v. Thomas.  I read it and used it to check Lindsey's reporting.  This document led me to look for other court documents that I also used to check Lindsey's reporting.  I also used them to evaluate the postings in the Reddit thread.  While I think some contributors were not fair to Lindsey, nor were they being accurate in their assessment of the report
Read more